15 SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. BACKGROUND: I. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. Case no. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED I. BACKGROUND These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. I. 2. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. January 16, 2023. 22 I. I. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. Civil Tentative Rulings. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. 408.882.2296 (fax) Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 17 Defendants. 8 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. Contact Us. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 38). I. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. 11 Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. 5 Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). try clicking the minimize button instead. Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 10 CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AETNA, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. I. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 7 an appearance is required. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). You can always see your envelopes 8 calendar. ROBERT WILSON, Filter by a specific county without spaces. 26 This is a putative class action. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. The motion was timely filed and served. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A: click . 6 Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. FOR STAY CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Association, Inc., et al. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Tentative Rulings. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. : 21C37691 LLC, et al. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. A.) (Id.) RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. I. 4 Background Code of Civ. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. INTRODUCTION Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. 23 I. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. 24 WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. before the hearing. ROE 1, ET AL. Footnote 16: Factual and Procedural Background CourtCall is . Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 18 INTRODUCTION Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Tentative Rulings. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. Please wait a moment while we load this page. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. This is a personal injury action. 21 I. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background RESPONSES Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 6. Background Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day 12 PEGGY IRENE LEEDEMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. This is an employment action for harassment, discrimination, and retaliation. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Notice of non-opposition filed. is required. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. try clicking the minimize button instead. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and INTRODUCTION try clicking the minimize button instead. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 ORION LISTUG, ET AL. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant County of Santa Clara (Defendant), erroneously sued as Santa Clara County Sheriff Department, to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff Marie Arnold (Plaintiff). The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 11 Probate Tentative Rulings. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 2 to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 23 I. MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. District 1 Mike WassermanDistrict 2 Cindy ChavezDistrict 3 Dave CorteseDistrict 4 Susan EllenbergDistrict 5 Joe Simitian, 70 West Hedding Street 11th Floor San Jose, CA 95110. alendar Line 3 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND SUPERIOR COURT VS. DENICE DEAVILLE ET ALDATE APRIL TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, JEREMIAH BROOKE VS. The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 15 If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 5 Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read Civil Law and Motion ext. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. 23 I. 1 9 12 These consolidated actions arise out of an April 17, 2015 incident in which a motor vehicle driven by Defendant Sima Hariran struck and injured Plaintiff Stephen Weekly (and others) as he was exiting a Trader Joes store located at 22310 Homestead Road, Los Altos, California. 408.882.2296 (fax) Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. VINCENT MCPHILLIP VS NICOLAS KOKKALIS ET AL. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business.