5 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. ) Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ) Law (9th ed. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 ) Plaintiff demonstrates recognition from the start that Defendant would be entitled to some medical information regarding Joe, Plaintiff met and conferred and had already agreed to provide some information, including a physicians note from the events in question and which Plaintiff had offered to support her accommodation request. 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 9 LILLIAM L. SHYAM, ) Department: 404 Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. (6th Ed.2021, March 2022 Update) Judgment 67-73; 7 Witkin, Cal.Proc. The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. ) ) ) Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) Quick Links 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 ) ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-18-353262 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Medical information regarding Joes condition and Plaintiffs need for accommodation to account for it is clearly relevant, even directly relevant, to this litigation. (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks 11 ) The actions undertaken by Ms. Smith are clearly below the standard of care, and SFPKOA make no efforts to argue the contrary. If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Central Pathology Service Med. If a license revocation is going to take effect, the legal process to ask a Superior Court judge to issue a stay order using an ex parte application for stay. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The information on this website is for general information purposes only. (415) 551-3750, Judge Susan M. Breall ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 Pro. Severe emotional distress [is] emotional distress of such substantial quantity or enduring quality that no reasonable man in a civilized society should be expected to endure it. (Fletcher v. Western Life Insurance Co. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 376, 397; see alsoCACI 1600.). 96, llc atique rehman sarahann shapiro joseph k. bravo plaintiff's motion for summary judgment tentative ruling: parties to appear posted: 3:00 pm 11 ) Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. ) ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Ibid. (Subd (k) relettered effective January 1, 2008; adopted as subd (g) effective July 1, 1997; previously relettered as subd (h) effective July 1, 2000, and as subd (l) effective January 1, 2007; previously amended and relettered as subd (j) effective January 1, 2004.). ) 5 **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER BIFURCATION FOR STATUS ONLY D 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 ) (See CCP 430.10(e).) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 ) 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 However, pursuant to United States Code of Federal Regulations 8 C.F.R. (415) 551-3759, Court Manager ) ) Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 5 Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and . 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES It is not limited to claims for medical malpractice and covers any claim directly related to the professional services provided. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA If a responding party is not able to comply with a particular request, that party shall affirm that a diligent search and a reasonable inquiry has been made in an effort to comply with that demand. CCP 2031.230. A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). 5 ) 11 ) The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. ) Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. Pretrial Order for NON-COMPLEX Case s. CMC Order for COMPLEX Case s. Danny Y. Chou, Civil Judge. ) ) However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). (CCP 430.41(a)(3).) His life and legacy. SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. Applications to Stay Evictionscan be filed at any court location that accepts civil filings: - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse (Oakland), and. ) ) If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. ) Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 Com. "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. ) Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 11 ) ) 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 ) 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See, e.g. The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) These departments may go under different names in different counties. 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. 6 JULIE ANN ALBAY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387354 ) Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 10 You will lose the information in your envelope. 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355509 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. 5 9 KENIA MELISSA ELVIR, ) Department: 403 A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 5th 531, 557 & fn. ) Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. ) ) Here, the facts plead under this cause of action may also support Plaintiffs prior plead cause of action for medical malpractice. ) The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 11 ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Find electronic and print forms for court and sample legal agreements at the San Francisco Law Library. ) ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 13 TEN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. All cases that are assigned to a civil direct calendar department receive a Notice of Assignment. Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. Therefore, thedemurreris SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fourthcauseofaction. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) ) Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 11 ) As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. ) 11 ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF TEMPORARY EMER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 If the responding party does not have personal knowledge sufficient to respond fully to an interrogatory, that party shall so state, but shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information by inquiry to other natural persons or organizations, except where the information is equally available to the propounding party. CCP 2030.220(c). Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. 11 ) Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. 6 ELENA SANTIAGO, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779507 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, V 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 2030.290(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.300(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) provides that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. For the court to order sanctions against an attorney, the Court must find that the attorney advised their client to engage in discovery misconduct. 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER SPOUSAL OR PARTNER SUPPORT 5 ) Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). ) ) To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA at 991. 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan CCP 2030.300(c) (relating to interrogatories), and CCP 2031.310(c) (relating to requests for production of documents) each provide that a monetary sanction shall be imposed against the party losing a motion to compel further responses unless the court finds substantial justification for that partys position or other circumstances making sanctions unjust. The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. An ex parte application for an order must be accompanied by an affidavit or a declaration showing: (1) that the applicant informed the opposing party when and where the application would be made no later than 10:00 a.m. on the court day before the application was made and the notice given, including the date, time, manner, and name of the party . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) 11 ) 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 11 ) 6 ) ) 5 ) ) Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM It is worth noting that Defendants reply asserting this point was also late, filed only four court days prior to hearing. When an arbitration occurs in only one county, that county is the proper venue for motions to vacate the arbitration award. Id., 4-5. ) Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. ) 11 ) Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. ) San Francisco, CA 94102 However, whenever a party files a petition under the California Arbitration Act (CAA), the court in which such petition was filed retains jurisdiction to determine any subsequent petition involving the same agreement to arbitrate and the same controversy, and any such subsequent petition shall be filed in the same proceeding. CCP 1292.6. ) ) Plaintiff provides the physicians note on which Plaintiff was relying in seeking accommodation and this note provides some explanation of Joes condition. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 5 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Filings will be accepted by mail to 720 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, or in the civil filing drop box located on the first floor of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse . 5 will be able to access it on trellis. The court DENIES the motion. ) In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CU 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Phone: 415-705-1033 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. The requirements for proposed orders, including the requirements for submitting proposed orders by electronic means, are stated in rule 3.1312. ) The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Results. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. See, e.g. ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994.) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 5 Events. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. ) However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 5 195.). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) A plaintiff may not in the original complaint request punitive damages in an action for damages arising out of the professional negligence of a health care provider, and must move the court for leave to amend to include such a request based on a substantial probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim pursuant to Section 3294 of the Civil Code. (CCP 425.13.) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES If a party fails serve a timely response, the court shall impose sanctions unless it finds that the party subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022. 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Strategic discovery misconduct resulting in terminating sanctions is not a proper basis for mandatory relief under CCP 473(b). 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 ) (MP&A pp. 5 The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) ) ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . 11 ) Effective Monday, July 19, 2021, all persons entering any court facility will be required to properly wear a face covering over their nose and mouth, regardless of their vaccination status. 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 5 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 5 This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 5 6 CHRISTOPHER JAMES RIVERS, ) Case Number: FMS-17-387056 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (1987) 194 Cal..App.3d 1023, 1027 (judgment amended to add defendant corporations alter ego, in control of the litigation, as additional judgment debtor on ground that omission was misnomer). (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 apply to most motions. 5 In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. Department 405 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 However, per CCP 1005, Plaintiffs opposition was due nine court days prior to hearing, and Plaintiff filed his opposition only seven days prior.